Wake dynamics of wind turbines in unsteady streamwise flow conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The unsteady flow physics of wind-turbine wakes under dynamic forcing conditions are critical to the modelling and control of wind farms for optimal power density. Unsteady forcing in the streamwise direction may be generated by unsteady inflow conditions in the atmospheric boundary layer, dynamic induction control of the turbine or streamwise surge motions of a floating offshore wind turbine due to floating-platform oscillations. This study seeks to identify the dominant flow mechanisms in unsteady wakes forced by a periodic upstream inflow condition. A theoretical framework for the problem is derived, which describes travelling-wave undulations in the wake radius and streamwise velocity. These dynamics encourage the aggregation of tip vortices into large structures that are advected along in the wake. Flow measurements in the wake of a periodically surging turbine were obtained in an optically accessible towing-tank facility, with an average diameter-based Reynolds number of 300 000 and with surge-velocity amplitudes of up to 40 % of the mean inflow velocity. Qualitative agreement between trends in the measurements and model predictions is observed, supporting the validity of the theoretical analyses. The experiments also demonstrate large enhancements in the recovery of the wake relative to the steady-flow case, with wake-length reductions of up to 46.5 % and improvements in the available power at 10 diameters downstream of up to 15.7 %. These results provide fundamental insights into the dynamics of unsteady wakes and serve as additional evidence that unsteady fluid mechanics can be leveraged to increase the power density of wind farms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".