MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404828176 · doi:10.1136/lupus-2024-001264

Renal response status to predict long-term renal survival in patients with lupus nephritis: results from the Toronto Lupus Cohort

2024· article· en· W4404828176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLupus Science & Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
FundersLupus Research AllianceAstraZenecaEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsMedicineLupus nephritisInternal medicineRenal functionRenal biopsySystemic lupus erythematosusCohortRetrospective cohort studyEnd stage renal diseaseGastroenterologyUrologyHemodialysisDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To evaluate modified versions of the Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis (BLISS-LN) belimumab study primary efficacy renal response (mPERR) and complete renal response (mCRR) criteria (excluding mandatory corticosteroid tapering) as predictors of real-world, long-term renal outcomes among patients with lupus nephritis (LN). Methods This retrospective, observational study (GSK Study 212866) used deidentified data between 1970 and 2015 from the University of Toronto Lupus Cohort from adults diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus and biopsy-proven Class III±V, IV±V or V LN. At 24 months postbiopsy, patients were retrospectively indexed as responders/non-responders based on mPERR (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤20% below biopsy value/≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and urine protein:creatinine ratio (uPCR) ≤0.7 g/day) or mCRR (eGFR ≤10% below biopsy value/≥90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and uPCR ≤0.5 g/day) criteria. The association between index mPERR (primary outcome) or mCRR (secondary outcome) status and long-term (up to 25 years, until censoring or death) renal survival (no progression to end-stage kidney disease (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , dialysis or transplant) or death) was assessed. Results Overall, 179 patients were included in the analysis (mPERR responders, n=128; non-mPERR responders, n=51). Most patients were female (87.2%); the mean (SD) age was 34.1 (11.3) years. Long-term renal survival was attained for 78.9% of mPERR responders and 60.8% of non-mPERR responders; achieving mPERR was associated with an increased likelihood of long-term renal survival versus not achieving mPERR (log-rank p=0.0119). Overall, 102 patients were mCRR responders, and 77 were non-mCRR responders. Long-term renal survival was attained for 80.4% of mCRR responders and 64.9% of non-mCRR responders; achieving mCRR was associated with an increased likelihood of long-term renal survival than not achieving mCRR (log-rank p=0.0259). Conclusions Achieving mPERR or mCRR was associated with improved long-term renal survival, highlighting that these statuses are suitable predictors of long-term renal outcomes in patients with LN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it