Machine learning-enhanced immunopeptidomics applied to T-cell epitope discovery for COVID-19 vaccines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Next-generation T-cell-directed vaccines for COVID-19 focus on establishing lasting T-cell immunity against current and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Precise identification of conserved T-cell epitopes is critical for designing effective vaccines. Here we introduce a comprehensive computational framework incorporating a machine learning algorithm—MHCvalidator—to enhance mass spectrometry-based immunopeptidomics sensitivity. MHCvalidator identifies unique T-cell epitopes presented by the B7 supertype, including an epitope from a + 1-frameshift in a truncated Spike antigen, supported by ribosome profiling. Analysis of 100,512 COVID-19 patient proteomes shows Spike antigen truncation in 0.85% of cases, revealing frameshifted viral antigens at the population level. Our EpiTrack pipeline tracks global mutations of MHCvalidator-identified CD8 + T-cell epitopes from the BNT162b4 vaccine. While most vaccine epitopes remain globally conserved, an immunodominant A*01-associated epitope mutates in Delta and Omicron variants. This work highlights SARS-CoV-2 antigenic features and emphasizes the importance of continuous adaptation in T-cell vaccine development. The identification of T cell epitopes is a critical step in understanding the immune response to infection and in designing vaccine based approaches. Here the authors introduce a frame work of antigen discovery called MHCvalidator and Epitrack to identify new antigenic features for T-cell COVID-19 vaccines and characterise a novel non-canonical epitope from a truncated Spike variant and mutation of an immunodominant epitope in the BNT162b4 vaccine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".