MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404833017 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5541.4.7

Three new species of Demidospermus (Monopisthocotyla: Dactylogyridae) parasitizing Ageneiosus inermis (Siluriformes: Auchenipteridae) from western Amazon, Brazil

2024· article· en· W4404833017 on OpenAlexaff
Márcia Cristina Nascimento Justo, Williane Maria de Oliveira Martins, Simone Chinicz Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsTransAlta (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyFaunaAmazon rainforestSuckerEcologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During a study on the helminth fauna of fishes in the Juruá and Moa Rivers, State of Acre, north Brazil, three new species of Demidospermus Suriano, 1983 were found parasitizing Ageneiosus inermis (Auchenipteridae). Demidospermus juruaensis sp. nov. is characterized by its accessory piece, which is robust and straight, anchor-shaped distally, as well as by morphology of its hooks, which have a delicate and expanded shaft with a spear-shape ending. Demidospermus bifurcatus sp. nov. is characterized by a male copulatory organ (MCO) composed of a robust tube, with a bisected tip at the distal end and a robust accessory piece, that embraces the MCO along its entire length. Demidospermus takemotoi sp. nov. differs from its congeners by its long, tubular and slender accessory piece, which is almost the same length as the MCO. These findings bring the number of valid Demidospermus species to 36. The results of this research on the helminth parasites of fishes in Acre State underscore the importance of carrying similar studies on other fish species, thereby enhancing understanding of biodiversity in the Neotropical Region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207