MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404834556 · doi:10.5539/mas.v18n1p21

Status Report on Piliostigma Reticulatum (D.C.) Hochst in Sahel Region of Maradi Niger

2024· article· en· W4404834556 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soufianou Chaibou Oumarou, Issoufou Amadou

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Piliostigma reticulatum (D.C.) Hochst is a plant belonging to the legume family. The population widely uses it as medicine, food, feed, and many others. This study aimed to enlighten the status of P. reticulatum in the Maradi region through an ethno-nutritional survey. Three localities in the region were concerned by the study, namely the city of Maradi, the rural commune of Sarkin Hausa (Mayahi department), and the Aguie department. A population of 920 people were interviewed, mostly constituted of Hausa ethnic group (89.5%). The respondents were classified according to gender with 36.2% female and 63.8% male. However, 55.5% of them were aged between 20 and 40 years old. The main activity of respondents was mainly agriculture (30%) followed by pupils/students (24.6%). This study shows that P. reticulatum 97.4% of the population in the study area surveys stated to recognize the plant. Furthermore, it was noted that 99% of the surveys that recognized the plant were ≥ 40 years old. On the other hand, this wild plant is better known in rural areas (100% in the rural commune of Sarkin Hausa) than in urban areas (93.53% in the city of Maradi). In addition, the tree is better used in rural areas (99% in Sarkin Hausa) than in urban areas (73.23% in Maradi). It was found that P. reticulatum is an available tree throughout the study zone (92.7%). Indeed, 89.5% of respondents know that the tree is used either in human food or in animal feed and that these pods and seeds are the most used parts accordingly 27.9% and 15.3% respectively. Indeed, highly appreciated by this population, up to its usage in traditional medicine; thus, the study revealed that 35.3% of respondents disclosed that all organs of the plant are useful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207