Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Examining the history of the Black Loyalists is essential to Black Canadian history. More significantly is examining the social inequality the Black Loyalists faced in the past. Much of the early history of the Black Loyalists is shaped by the institution of slavery. The institution of slavery is maintained by ideologies and traditions that justify another race’s enslavement. At the heart of these justifications is anti-black racism. Racism weaved throughout the fabric of white society and resulted from hundreds of years of imperialism, subjugation, and racist dogma. Black individuals had no legal safeguard for themselves nor any political power. This essay intends to argue that the Black Loyalists’ experience illustrates the racist attitudes held by white society. This paper will focus on the preconception that Black people’s value came from their usefulness in service to white people. The maintenance of anti-black racism will be examined through three generalizations. The different motivations and experiences between white and Black Loyalists, the overlap between freed and enslaved Black people living in Nova Scotia, and the continual exploitation of Black labour for white people’s sole benefit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it