MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404840186 · doi:10.5382/econgeo.5106

Seeing Through Metamorphism: Geochemical and Isotopic Studies of Amphibolite Facies Mafic-Siliciclastic (Besshi-Type) Massive Sulfide Deposits at the Elizabeth Copper Mine, Vermont, USA

2024· article· en· W4404840186 on OpenAlexaff
John F. Slack, Wayne C. Shanks, Laurel G. Woodruff

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaficGeologyMetamorphismSiliciclasticGeochemistryMetamorphic faciesSulfideFaciesCopperPetrologyGeomorphologyChemistryStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Elizabeth volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit in Vermont is atypical among such deposits in containing both stratiform Fe-Cu-Zn-Mn mineralization and stratabound Al-Na-K-B enrichments and Ca-Mg depletions in wall rocks. This mafic-siliciclastic (Besshi-type) deposit is contained in a thick sequence of Lower Devonian pelitic schist, minor quartzite, and sparse amphibolite. Wall rocks to the sulfide ores are predominantly amphibole-bearing rocks lacking quartz. The deposit has been metamorphosed to middle amphibolite facies and is complexly deformed by two folding events and syndeformational thrust faults. Whole-rock analyses of altered metabasaltic wall rocks reveal locally high concentrations of SiO2 (up to 85.0 wt %), Al2O3 (up to 32.5 wt %), K2O (up to 4.02 wt %), or Na2O (up to 6.02 wt %). Data for relatively immobile trace elements (Sc, Cr, Ti, Zr, Th) and rare earth elements (REEs) indicate protoliths of low-Ti tholeiitic basalt broadly of normal mid-ocean ridge basalt (N-MORB) affinity. The altered wall rocks are mineralogically distinctive in containing, in many samples, abundant muscovite, phlogopite, albite, dolomite, tourmaline, and/or tremolite-actinolite. One very aluminous unit of coarse garnet-mica schist, also with a tholeiitic basalt protolith, has local domains composed of abundant staurolite, minor margarite and sillimanite, and rare corundum. All of these altered wall rocks are stratabound but generally discontinuous along strike, in contrast to Mn-rich stratiform lenses (coticules), for which mineralogical and geochemical data suggest deposition as VMS-related chemical sediments. Al-normalized calculations of whole-rock geochemical data for mineralogically different types of altered basalts, relative to an inferred least altered precursor in the mine sequence, show average major additions (>50%) of Mn, Na, and K, and major losses (>50%) of Mg and Ca for most types. Changes in Si, Ti, and Fe are generally negligible (±5%), except for siliceous, tourmaline-rich rocks that display on average a major addition of 254% Si. Whole-rock δ18O values of silica-poor samples with metabasaltic precursors range from 10.7 to 13.4‰. These values are uncorrelated with SiO2 contents and are mostly higher than that of the least altered metabasalt in the Elizabeth mine area (δ18O = 11.1‰), suggesting premetamorphic subseafloor alteration by relatively low-temperature (ca. 150°–250°C) VMS-related hydrothermal fluids. A lack of depletion of light REEs for most of the altered metabasalts, compared to the least altered precursor, is also consistent with a low-temperature alteration process. Sulfur isotope values for pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and pyrite in massive sulfide and disseminations in wall rocks range from 4.3 to 9.3‰, a typical range for sediment-hosted sea-floor hydrothermal systems, reflecting mixed sulfur sources derived mainly from footwall basalts and coeval seawater sulfate. Shale-normalized REE data for coticules show small negative Ce and Eu anomalies that suggest deposition of precursor Mn-rich sediments in mildly oxic waters. In contrast, most samples of massive sulfides lack Ce anomalies but have small to moderate positive Eu anomalies, reflecting mineralization under anoxic and reducing conditions at or above 250°C. The presence of negative Ce anomalies in the coticules and two samples of massive sulfide, but the lack of such anomalies in other massive sulfide samples, suggest deposition within a stratified water column in which the redoxcline fluctuated due to hydrothermal venting of reductants such as Fe2+, Mn2+, H2S, H2, and CH4, which episodically produced anoxic bottom waters during VMS mineralization. The length (≥3.4 km) and relatively narrow width (~500 m) of the Elizabeth sulfide deposit is attributed to formation in an elongate sea-floor graben that served as a locus of tholeiitic basaltic volcanism and hydrothermal mineralization. Morphological and geochemical data for highly altered metabasaltic wall rocks of the deposit provide evidence for pervasive subseafloor alteration, during and after exhalative chemical precipitation of sulfides and Mn-Fe sediments. Possible modern analogs are the predominantly sediment-hosted VMS deposits in Middle Valley and Escanaba trough in the northeast Pacific Ocean and Guaymas basin in the Gulf of California. The metalliferous sulfide deposits of the Atlantis II Deep in the Red Sea may be the best modern analog, based on their sheetlike morphology, sulfur isotope values, and associated Fe and Mn oxyhydroxide sediments that are potential protoliths of the coticule rocks in the Elizabeth mine sequence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207