SEGURANÇA DO PACIENTE E O PAPEL DO ENFERMEIRO: ESTRATÉGIAS PARA PROMOÇÃO DA ASSISTÊNCIA HOSPITALAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJETIVO: Analisar as estratégias implementadas pelos enfermeiros no ambiente hospitalar para garantir a segurança do paciente, visando reduzir o risco de danos desnecessários durante a assistência prestada. METODOLOGIA: Trata-se de um estudo analítico, que utiliza como técnica a Revisão Integrativa da Literatura. A busca foi realizada dentro das bases de dados dentro da Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS): SCIELO, MEDLINE, BDENF e LILACS, por meio da junção de três DeCS, cruzados com operador booleano “AND”: “Segurança do Paciente” AND “Enfermagem Hospitalar” AND “Gestão de Risco”. RESULTADOS: Os enfermeiros implementam estratégias de segurança no ambiente hospitalar para reduzir riscos e melhorar a qualidade da assistência, conforme indicado pela revisão da literatura. CONCLUSÃO: A utilização de práticas baseadas em evidências, educação contínua, e protocolos rigorosos demonstraram ser eficazes na prevenção de eventos adversos e na promoção de um ambiente seguro para os pacientes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".