Recomposer l’archive(s) de et dans la pratique musicale : fictions, angoisses et performances musico-archivistiques en Acadie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une lecture critique de l’installation multimédia Écoutez tou[te]s, petit[e]s et grand[e]s ! de l’artiste interdisciplinaire acadien·ne Rémi Belliveau, cet article se penche sur les façons dont s’exprime la recomposition de l’archive(s) de et dans la pratique musicale des collectivités acadiennes au Canada. L’article problématise les enjeux que soulève une conceptualisation linéaire de la transmission mnémonique marquée par le passage d’une performance orale (oralité/corporalité) vers sa conservation documentaire et audiovisuelle (littérarité/matérialité). Il permet de s’intéresser aux apports de la fiction dans des performances de l’archive(s) motivées par l’affect d’angoisse que provoque l’anticipation de la disparition d’une culture minoritaire. Cet article, à travers le cas plus précis de la chanson folklorique acadienne, jette un regard sur l’imbrication des processus de création, de transmission et d’interprétation de diverses ressources mnémoniques à travers lesquels sont actualisées des représentations esthétiques situées de l’histoire et des traditions musicales de la collectivité acadienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".