MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design and analysis of a nuclear and wind-based carbon negative potassium hydroxide water-splitting cycle for hydrogen and ammonia production

2024· article· en· W4404846388 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Chemical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotassium hydroxideAmmoniaHydrogen productionHydrogenWater splittingPotassiumCarbon fibersChemistryProduction (economics)Ammonia productionWaste managementEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A new KOH thermochemical water splitting cycle with carbon capture is developed. • Nuclear-wind energy sources are used to meet the community needs. • In the case study, ammonia is generated for transatlantic export of hydrogen. • The energy and exergy efficiencies of KOH cycle are 45 % and 63 % at 591 °C. • The overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the integrated system are 33 % and 28 %. To achieve the net-zero target, clean energy sources, carbon-free fuels, and carbon capture are crucial pieces. The current study develops a new potassium hydroxide-based thermochemical water-splitting cycle and combines it with an ammonia export facility with community and data center. A sodium fast reactor and an offshore wind farm are considered to drive the integrated system to generate hydrogen, ammonia, electricity, heating and cooling. The proposed thermochemical water-splitting cycle uses 591 °C heat with a non-equilibrium reaction to generate hydrogen. The generated hydrogen is further used for ammonia generation via high-pressure ammonia reactor and pressure swing adsorption for nitrogen extraction from air. In the integration, sodium fast reactor provides the required heat to carry out integrated processes, where in high-temperature heat is distributed between the thermochemical cycle and the Rankine cycle, and the recovered heat is utilized in further processes. The proposed system is analyzed from thermodynamic aspects using energy and exergy approaches, supported by a parametric study. In addition, a time-dependent analysis is carried out under varying community and data center loads as well as varying wind speed, for each hour in a typical meteorological year. In the proposed integrated system, 230.4 MW of wind farm, 1 GW th of sodium fast reactor, a thermochemical cycle with 3.6 tonnes/hour hydrogen production and 78 tonnes/hour carbon capture capacities, a two-stage Rankine cycle, ammonia generator, and an absorption refrigeration cycle are considered. The energy and exergy efficiencies of newly developed five-step thermochemical cycle are 45.39 % and 62.78 % when reaction temperatures are considered as 240 °C for hydrogen generation and 591 °C for separation. For the integrated system, the overall energy and exergy efficiencies for the entire year are found as 32.61 % and 28.44 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers & Chemical EngineeringSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207