MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404848450 · doi:10.1109/focs61266.2024.00016

Three-Edge-Coloring Projective Planar Cubic Graphs: A Generalization of the Four Color Theorem

2024· article· en· W4404848450 on OpenAlexaff
Yuta Inoue, Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi, Atsuyuki Miyashita, Bojan Mohar, Tomohiro Sonobe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralizationEdge coloringCombinatoricsProjective testMathematicsEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPlanar graphGraph coloringDiscrete mathematicsComputer sciencePure mathematicsArtificial intelligenceGraphMathematical analysisLine graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove that every cyclically 4-edge-connected cubic graph that can be embedded in the projective plane, with the single exception of the Petersen graph, is 3-edge-colorable. In other words, the only (nontrivial) snark that can be embedded in the projective plane is the Petersen graph. This implies that a 2-connected cubic (multi)graph that can be embedded in the projective plane is not 3-edge-colorable if and only if it can be obtained from the Petersen graph by replacing each vertex by a 2-edge-connected planar cubic (multi)graph. Here, a replacement of a vertex$v$in a cubic graph$G$is the operation that takes a 2-connected planar (cubic) multigraph$H$containing some vertex$u$of degree 3, unifying$G-v$and$H-u$, and connecting the vertices in$N_{G}[v]$in$G-v$with the three neighbors of$u$in$H-u$with 3 edges. Any graph obtained in such a way is said to be Petersen-like. This result is a nontrivial generalization of the Four Color Theorem, and its proof requires a combination of extensive computer verification and computer-free extension of existing proofs on colorability. Using this result, we obtain the following algorithmic consequence. Input: A cubic graph$G$. Output: Either a 3-edge-coloring of$G$, an obstruction showing that$G$is not 3-edge-colorable, or the conclusion that$G$cannot be embedded in the projective plane (certified by exposing a forbidden minor for the projective plane contained in$G$). Time complexity:$O(n^{2})$, where$n=\vert V(G)\vert$. An unexpected consequence of this result is a coloring-flow duality statement for the projective plane: A cubic graph embedded in the projective plane is 3-edge-colorable if and only if its dual multigraph is 5-vertex-colorable. Moreover, we show that a 2-edge connected graph embedded in the projective plane admits a nowhere-zero 4-flow unless it is Petersen-like (in which case it does not admit nowhere-zero 4-flows). This proves a strengthening of the Tutte 4-flow conjecture for graphs on the projective plane. Some of our proofs require extensive computer verification. The necessary source codes, together with the input and output files and the complete set of more than 5000 reducible configurations, are available on Github11https://github.com/edge-coloring. Refer to the “README.md” file in each directory for instructions on how to run each program. which can be considered as an addendum to this paper. Moreover, we provide pseudocodes for all our computer verifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraph Labeling and Dimension ProblemsFrench-language works237,207