VOCÊ QUER ENRIQUECER A EXPERIÊNCIA DOS CONSUMIDORES? DEIXE-OS NEGOCIAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO Examinamos o comportamento de negociação do consumidor em três países diferentes - Áustria, Brasil e Itália - para fornecer o conhecimento intercultural com relação às intenções, processos e resultados da negociação. Ao contrário de pesquisas anteriores, descobrimos que os clientes negociam em busca de realização hedônica, em vez de obter descontos. A satisfação com os resultados da negociação também medeia a relação entre a motivação hedônica para negociar e a intenção de negociar. Nossos resultados sugerem que os varejistas devem enriquecer as experiências de compra dos clientes ativando suas motivações hedônicas para negociar, indo além de simplesmente sinalizar disposição para negociar descontos, garantias e serviços adicionais. Identificamos a intenção de negociação como uma nova ferramenta para os varejistas aumentarem a satisfação do cliente no processo de compra do cliente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".