MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404852518 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01366-24

Rapid inference of antibiotic susceptibility phenotype of uropathogens using metagenomic sequencing with neighbor typing

2024· article· en· W4404852518 on OpenAlexafffund
Amanda Carroll, Leanne Mortimer, Hiren Ghosh, Sandra Reuter, Hajo Grundmann, Karel Břinda, William P. Hanage, Angel Li, Aimee Paterson, Andrew Purssell, Ashley M. Rooney, N. Yee, Bryan Coburn, Shola Able-Thomas, Martin Antonio, Allison McGeer, Derek R. MacFadden

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoCanadian Electricity AssociationCanada Research ChairsOttawa Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJoint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial ResistancePfizer
KeywordsMultilocus sequence typingMetagenomicsTypingBiologyGeneticsComputational biologyMicrobiologyGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Timely diagnostic tools are needed to improve antibiotic treatment. Pairing metagenomic sequencing with genomic neighbor typing algorithms may support rapid clinically actionable results. We created resistance-associated sequence elements (RASE) databases for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp . and used them to predict antibiotic susceptibility in directly sequenced (Oxford Nanopore) urine specimens from critically ill patients. RASE analysis was performed on pathogen-specific reads from metagenomic sequencing. We evaluated the ability to predict (i) multi-locus sequence type (MLST) and (ii) susceptibility profiles. We used neighbor typing to predict MLST and susceptibility phenotype of E. coli (64/80) and Klebsiella spp . (16/80) from urine samples. When optimized by lineage score, MLST predictions were concordant for 73% of samples. Similarly, a RASE-susceptible prediction for a given isolate was associated with a specificity and a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for susceptibility of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.54–0.76) and 2.26 (95% CI, 1.75–2.92), respectively, with an increase in the probability of susceptibility of 10%. A RASE-non-susceptible prediction was associated with a sensitivity and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) for susceptibility of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74–0.84) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.24–0.43) respectively, with a decrease in the probability of susceptibility of 20%. Numerous antibiotic classes could reasonably be reconsidered empiric therapy by shifting empiric probabilities of susceptibility across relevant treatment thresholds. Moreover, these predictions can be available within 6 h. Metagenomic sequencing of urine specimens with neighbor typing provides rapid and informative predictions of lineage and antibiotic susceptibility with the potential to impact clinical decision-making. IMPORTANCE Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common diagnosis in hospitals and are often treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotics. These broad-spectrum agents can select for resistance in these bacteria and co-colonizing organisms. The use of narrow-spectrum agents is desirable as an antibiotic stewardship measure; however, it is counterbalanced by the need for adequate therapy. Identification of causative organisms and their antibiotic susceptibility can help direct treatment; however, conventional testing requires days to produce actionable results. Methods to quickly and accurately predict susceptibility phenotypes for pathogens causing UTI could thus improve both patient outcomes and antibiotic stewardship. Here, expanding on previous work showing accurate prediction for certain Gram-positive pathogens, we demonstrate how the use of RASE from metagenomic sequencing can provide informative and rapid phenotype prediction results for common Gram-negative pathogens in UTI, highlighting the future potential of this method to be used in clinical settings to guide empiric antibiotic selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207