MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404853751 · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12122738

Expanding the Molecular Genetic Landscape of Dystrophinopathies and Associated Phenotypes

2024· article· en· W4404853751 on OpenAlexafffund
Katja Neuhoff, Ozge Aksel Kilicarslan, Corinna Preuße, Ann‐Kathrin Zaum, Heike Kölbel, Hanns Lochmüller, Ulrike Schara‐Schmidt, Kiran Polavarapu, Andreas Roos, Andrea Gangfuß

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedicines · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundCanada Research ChairsCanada First Research Excellence FundCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDeutsche Gesellschaft für MuskelkrankeEuropean CommissionCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsPhenotypeMuscular dystrophyDiseaseGeneMedicineDuchenne muscular dystrophyGenotypeGenotype-phenotype distinctionMolecular geneticsBioinformaticsNeuromuscular diseaseGenetic testingPathologyGeneticsBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: X-linked dystrophinopathies are a group of neuromuscular diseases caused by pathogenic variants in the DMD gene (MIM *300377). Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD; MIM #310200) is the most common inherited muscular dystrophy. Methods: We screened datasets of 403 male, genetically confirmed X-linked dystrophinopathy patients and identified 13 pathogenic variants of the DMD gene that have not been described in the literature thus far. For all patients we provide additional data on the clinical course, genotype–phenotype correlations as well as histological datasets of nine patients. In two cases, we used RNA-Seq analyses, showing that this method can be particularly helpful in cases of deep intrinsic variants. Results: We were able to show, that a combination of the different datasets is helpful to counsel families and provides a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. Conclusions: Overall, we elaborated upon the persistent challenge of determining the course of disease from genetic analysis alone, rather supporting the concept of a clinical continuum of dystrophinopathies with our combined clinical, histological and molecular genetic findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedicinesSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207