MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404856371 · doi:10.26685/urncst.675

The Indigenous Medicine Wheel

2024· article· en· W4404856371 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousMedicineTraditional medicineBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Definition: The Medicine Wheel, also known as the Sacred Hoop, is a vital Indigenous symbol that “has been used by generations of [Indigenous] people for health and healing” long before European colonizers arrived in North America. Depicted as a circle divided into four quadrants, it represents the four cardinal directions as well as Father Sky, Mother Earth, and the Spirit Tree. Each quadrant is linked to specific colors, elements, animal totems, and stages of life, promoting a balanced and harmonious existence. Body: The Medicine Wheel’s historical origins trace back thousands of years, with ancient stone structures found in North America indicating its ceremonial and astronomical significance. Today, it appears in various forms, such as artifacts and paintings. The Medicine Wheel’s structure includes four quadrants representing North, East, South, and West - each associated with unique colors, elements, animals, and life stages. For example, the East symbolizes birth and new beginnings, while the North represents wisdom and spiritual understanding. The circular shape reflects the cyclical nature of life and the interconnectedness of all beings, emphasizing balance and harmony for overall well-being. In Indigenous communities, the Medicine Wheel is crucial for spiritual and healing practices, guiding ceremonies, and rituals to restore balance. Traditional healers use it alongside ceremonial plants and spiritual energies from each direction. The Medicine Wheel also fosters communal connection and emphasizes collective well-being. Contemporary healthcare and research increasingly recognize the importance of incorporating Indigenous perspectives. As such, the Medicine Wheel offers valuable insights into holistic health and wellness, challenging the Western biomedical model. Researchers have applied its teachings to understand social determinants of health, mental health, and nutrition, for instance. This decolonized approach enhances research methodologies and improves healthcare for Indigenous communities by promoting cultural safety and better patient outcomes. Overall, the Medicine Wheel is a profound symbol of balance, harmony, and interconnectedness – all of which are essential for holistic health. Its historical roots and modern applications highlight its significance. By integrating Indigenous knowledge into healthcare and research, the Medicine Wheel advances a more inclusive, diverse, and equitable approach to healthcare, benefiting Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicEmpathy and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207