MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404856743 · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-81279-0

Ga-doped ZnO nanoparticles for enhanced CO2 gas sensing applications

2024· article· en· W4404856743 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Inas Taha, Zeyad M. Abdulhamid, Rainer Straubinger, Abdul‐Hamid Emwas, Kyriaki Polychronopoulou, Dalaver H. Anjum

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUnited Arab Emirates UniversityKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyYork University
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceElectron paramagnetic resonanceDopingNanoparticleDopantAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Transmission electron microscopyPowder diffractionNanotechnologyChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsCrystallographyChemistryNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gallium-doped zinc oxide (GZO) has demonstrated significant potential in gas-sensing applications due to its enhanced electrical and chemical properties. This study focuses on the synthesis, characterization, and gas-sensing performance of GZO nanoparticles (NPs), specifically targeting CO₂ detection, which is crucial for environmental monitoring and industrial safety. The GZO samples were synthesized using a sol-gel method, and their crystal structure was determined through X-ray diffraction (XRD), confirming the successful incorporation of gallium into the ZnO lattice. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to analyze the samples' elemental composition and chemical state, revealing the presence of Ga in the ZnO matrix and providing insights into the doping effects. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to confirm the purity and elemental distribution of the synthesized samples, ensuring the homogeneity of the Ga doping. In-situ TEM measurements were also conducted on one of the three samples, with the smallest size. The experiment involved exposing the sample to argon (Ar) as a reference gas and carbon dioxide (CO₂) as the target gas to evaluate the sensor's response under real-time conditions. The in-situ TEM provided nanoscale observation of changes in the crystal structure parameters, particularly the d-spacing, which exhibited significant alterations exceeding 3.2% when exposed to CO₂ and Ar gases. Furthermore, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and optical joint density of states (OJDS) analyses were performed to examine the presence of paramagnetic defects and to comprehensively understand the electronic structure within the GZO sample, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsFrench-language works237,207