MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404864649 · doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.102073

OXIDATIVE STRESS AND ANTIOXIDANT MARKERS IN ORAL SUBMUCOUS FIBROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CASE-CONTROL STUDIES

2024· review· en· W4404864649 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Evidence Based Dental Practice · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral Health Pathology and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOral submucous fibrosisOxidative stressMeta-analysisAntioxidantPathologyGastroenterologyDentistryInternal medicineBioinformaticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• This meta-analysis offers evidence for the association between salivary and serum markers of oxidative stress and antioxidants in patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF). • Oxidative stress and antioxidant systems as molecular markers of OSF may provide insights into disease pathology. • Increased levels of oxidative stress markers and decreased antioxidant marker levels in OSF patients highlight their role as potential biomarkers for OSF diagnosis. This meta-analysis systematically investigates the markers of oxidative stress (OS) and antioxidant systems in the saliva and serum of patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) and healthy controls. Using a comprehensive search of databases from their inception period to December 31, 2023, articles related to OS or antioxidant markers in patients with OSF and healthy controls were retrieved. Literature screening and data extraction were performed by two reviewers according to the set criteria, and a third evaluator was involved in case of disagreements. The included studies were assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and the results were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software. A total of 14 studies were included. Patients with OSF exhibited significantly higher levels of malondialdehyde (serum: SMD: 7.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.14–10.17, P < .00001, saliva: SMD: 3.07, 95% CI: 0.6–5.54, P < .00001) and 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine (saliva: SMD: 4.84, 95% CI: 3.49–6.18, P < .00001) than healthy controls. Levels of vitamin C (serum: SMD: −3.54, 95% CI: −4.10 to −2.99, P < .00001, saliva: SMD: −1.10, 95% CI: −1.39 to −0.80, P < .00001), vitamin E (saliva: SMD: −1.78, 95% CI: −2.1 to −1.45, P < .00001), and superoxide dismutase (serum: SMD: −9.77, 95% CI: −13.79 to −5.74, P < .00001) were significantly lower in patients with OSF than in healthy controls. The results showed increased levels of OS markers and decreased levels of antioxidant markers in patients with OSF, providing valuable indicators that may aid in clinical diagnosis and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it