MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404867107 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2024-260637

Acquired progressive torcular dural arteriovenous fistula after subtotal resection of peritorcular meningioma

2024· article· en· W4404867107 on OpenAlexaff
Undrakh-Erdene Erdenebold, Adrienne Weeks, Simon Walling, David Volders

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDigital subtraction angiographyArteriovenous fistulaMeningiomaRadiologyCraniotomyAngiographyCerebral angiographySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A woman in her mid-50s who had undergone a subtotal resection of a peritorcular meningioma 3 years earlier presented with symptoms suggestive of increased intracranial pressure. A delayed diagnosis of a torcular dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) diagnosis was made on MRI. Digital subtraction angiography confirmed a torcular dAVF (Borden type II). Staged 3 rounds of transarterial (TA) embolisation were performed using n-butyl cyanoacrylate, ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer and coils of the complex torcular dAVF, which significantly reduced the flow and corresponded with improved symptoms of pulsatile tinnitus, vision and headache. We reviewed previously reported cases of dAVFs that developed after craniotomy for meningioma resection. Despite its rarity, a torcular dAVF can develop after craniotomy and progress from low to high grade due to its location. Diagnosis requires a thorough understanding of subtle imaging findings, which may be present in follow-up studies obtained for tumour surveillance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207