Predicting early mortality in hemodialysis patients: a deep learning approach using a nationwide prospective cohort in South Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early mortality after hemodialysis (HD) initiation significantly impacts the longevity of HD patients. This study aimed to quantify the effect sizes of risk factors on mortality using various machine learning approaches. A cohort of 3284 HD patients from the CRC-ESRD (2008-2014) was analyzed. Mortality risk models were validated using logistic regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, and decision trees, as well as ensemble methods like bagging and random forest. To better handle missing data and time-series variables, a recurrent neural network (RNN) with an autoencoder was also developed. Additionally, survival models predicting hazard ratios were employed using survival analysis techniques. The analysis included 1750 prevalent and 1534 incident HD patients (mean age 58.4 ± 13.6 years, 59.3% male). Over a median follow-up of 66.2 months, the overall mortality rate was 19.3%. Random forest models achieved an AUC of 0.8321 for first-year mortality prediction, which was further improved by the RNN with autoencoder (AUC 0.8357). The survival bagging model had the highest hazard ratio predictability (C-index 0.7756). A shorter dialysis duration (< 14.9 months) and high modified Charlson comorbidity index scores (7-9) were associated with hazard ratios up to 7.76 (C-index 0.7693). Comorbidities were more influential than age in predicting early mortality. Monitoring dialysis adequacy (KT/V), RAAS inhibitor use, and urine output is crucial for assessing early prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".