MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404871467 · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106844

Characterization of hydrogel-scaffold mechanical properties and microstructure by using synchrotron propagation-based imaging

2024· article· en· W4404871467 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Naitao Li, Xiaoman Duan, Xiao Fan Ding, Ning Zhu, Daniel Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Research CouncilUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsMicrostructureSynchrotronScaffoldCharacterization (materials science)Materials scienceBiomedical engineeringNanotechnologyComposite materialOpticsMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogel-based scaffolds have been widely used in soft tissue regeneration due to their biocompatible and tissue-like environment for maintaining cellular functions and tissue regeneration. Understanding the mechanical properties and internal microstructure of hydrogel-based scaffold, once implanted, is imperative in tissue engineering applications and longitudinal studies. Notably, this has been challenging to date as various conventional characterization methods by, for example, mechanical testing (for mechanical properties) and microscope (for internal microstructure) are destructive as they require removing scaffolds from the implantation site and processing samples for characterization. Synchrotron radiation propagation-based imaging-computed tomography (SR-PBI-CT) is feasible and promising for non-destructive visualizing of hydrogel scaffolds. As inspired, this study aimed to perform a study on the characterization of mechanical properties and microstructure of hydrogel scaffolds based on the SR-PBI-CT. In this study, hydrogel biomaterial inks composed of 3% w/v alginate and 1% w/v gelatin were printed to form scaffolds, with some scaffolds being degraded over 3 days. Both degraded and undegraded scaffolds underwent compressive testing, with the strains being controlled at the preset values; meanwhile stresses within scaffolds were measuring, resulting the stress-strain curves. Concurrently, the scaffolds were also imaged and examined by SR-PBI-CT at Canadian Light Source (CLS). During the imaging process, the scaffolds were mechanically loaded, respectively, with the strains same as the ones in the aforementioned compressive testing, and at each strain, the scaffold was scanned with a pixel size of 13 μm. From the stress-strain curves obtained in the compression testing, the Young's modulus was evaluated to characterize the elastic behavior of scaffolds: with the range between around 5-25 kPa. From the images captured by SR-PBI-CT, the scaffolds microstructures were examined in terms of the strand cross-section area, pore size, and hydrogel volume. Further, from the SR-PBI-CT images, the stress within hydrogel of scaffolds were evaluated, showing the agreement with those obtained from compression testing. These results have illustrated that the mechanical properties and microstructures of scaffolds, ether being degraded or not, can be examined and characterized by the SR-PBI-CT imaging, in a non-destructive manner. This would represent a significant advance for facilitating longitudinal studies on the scaffolds once implanted in-vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materialsSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207