MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404871647 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3509352

Tightly Coupled UWB-INS Positioning With Passive Synchronization Using Continuous Clock Phase Tracking

2024· article· en· W4404871647 on OpenAlexafffund
Nushen M. Senevirathna, Oscar De Silva, George K. I. Mann, Raymond G. Gosine

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsComputer scienceSynchronization (alternating current)Clock synchronizationPhase synchronizationTracking (education)Phase-locked loopReal-time computingElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsJitterChannel (broadcasting)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work evaluates the effectiveness of a novel one-way time of flight-based passive ultrawideband (UWB) inertial navigation solution for indoor positioning of a mobile platform and formulates a design criterion for choosing between passive systems through noise analysis. The proposed tightly coupled time of arrival (TC-TOA) approach achieves passive synchronization by keeping track of the local clock and its derivatives as states. Using these states and position estimate, the reception timestamps of the network messages are predicted. The errors in these predicted timestamps are then used to update both clock states and the position states through accurate modeling of coupled interactions. The design results in a tightly coupled estimator formulation achieved using an error state Kalman filter with right quaternion error parameterization. The proposed method is evaluated using a MATLAB simulation environment and on a dataset acquired by flying a quadcopter in an indoor environment, with ground truth obtained from a motion capture system. Decawave DWM 1000-DEV hardware with custom firmware was used in the measurement acquisition process. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed tightly coupled system outperforms time difference of arrival (TDOA)-based methods, especially when the network transmission gap becomes large or in the presence of communication interruptions, which can happen in large-scale networks. Experimental validation resulted in RMS-position errors around 25 cm, with increasing differences between the TC-TOA versus TDOA methods as the number of anchors drops. Furthermore, the proposed method can accommodate measurement updates even when the connection with the network is interrupted down to one anchor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicUltra-Wideband Communications TechnologyFrench-language works237,207