Mindfulness in Surgical Training (MiST): A Modified Mindfulness Curriculum for Surgical Residents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Residents experience numerous work-related and personal stressors that make it difficult to focus in the operating room, negatively impacting learning and surgical performance. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy decreases anxiety and improves memory and learning. This study aimed to create a feasible and desirable modified mindfulness curriculum for surgical residents. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study using multiple methods design to assess a 12-week modified mindfulness curriculum tailored to busy surgical trainees involving a 30 min group session weekly and 15 minutes home practice daily. The main outcomes were program feasibility and desirability. Focus groups explored how mindfulness techniques were used in the operating room. Secondary outcomes were measured in a pre- and post- intervention design assessing surgical performance, anxiety, confidence and burnout using validated assessment scales. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, immediately following the course and at 3 months postintervention. SETTING: Academic obstetrics and gynecology residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Obstetrics and gynecology residents in postgraduate years 2-5 at the University of Toronto were invited to participate in Mindfulness in Surgical Training. RESULTS: Twelve (20%) out of 61 eligible residents enrolled in the program and 8 (67%) completed the course. There was a statistically significant decrease in anxiety (p < 0.001) and increase in surgical confidence (p = 0.007) following the mindfulness curriculum using validated survey tools. There was no change in burnout or surgical performance evaluations. Thematic analysis identified that mindfulness tools were beneficial and regularly utilized by participants in the operating room with sustained use 3 months post intervention. The biggest barrier to participation in the mindfulness curriculum was time. Participants felt the residency program should support ongoing mindfulness training to promote a positive culture shift. CONCLUSIONS: A modified mindfulness curriculum designed for surgical trainees is feasible, desirable, reduces anxiety and increases surgical confidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".