MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mycotoxins contaminations in Ethiopian food: Impacts, challenges, and mitigation strategies

2024· article· en· W4404876530 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycotoxinEnvironmental scienceFood safetyBusinessEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental healthFood scienceChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycotoxins are significant contaminants in food and agricultural commodities, particularly in developing countries like Ethiopia, where regulatory measures for mycotoxin control are inadequate. Mycotoxin contamination poses substantial risks to human and animal health, and economic stability in these regions, potentially adversely affecting food availability and security. This review aimed to assess the mycotoxin contamination status in Ethiopian foods, its impacts, factors contributing to its contamination, challenges to control it, and mitigation strategies in Ethiopian foods and agricultural commodities. Several notable mycotoxins have been found in various food items, and the levels of many of these mycotoxins are higher than the maximum allowable levels of FAO/WHO and EU. Different mitigation strategies are recommended, including agricultural improvements, and physical, chemical, and agronomic approaches, tailored for affordability among low-income farmers. The review concludes with proposals for sustained public awareness campaigns and enhanced technical and human capacity development within the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it