MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mycotoxins contaminations in Ethiopian food: Impacts, challenges, and mitigation strategies

2024· article· en· W4404876530 on OpenAlexaff
Belsti Atnkut, Atalaye Nigussie, Belay Berza, Abraham Mikru, Baisuo Zhao, Tess Astatkie

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycotoxinEnvironmental scienceFood safetyBusinessEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental healthFood scienceChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycotoxins are significant contaminants in food and agricultural commodities, particularly in developing countries like Ethiopia, where regulatory measures for mycotoxin control are inadequate. Mycotoxin contamination poses substantial risks to human and animal health, and economic stability in these regions, potentially adversely affecting food availability and security. This review aimed to assess the mycotoxin contamination status in Ethiopian foods, its impacts, factors contributing to its contamination, challenges to control it, and mitigation strategies in Ethiopian foods and agricultural commodities. Several notable mycotoxins have been found in various food items, and the levels of many of these mycotoxins are higher than the maximum allowable levels of FAO/WHO and EU. Different mitigation strategies are recommended, including agricultural improvements, and physical, chemical, and agronomic approaches, tailored for affordability among low-income farmers. The review concludes with proposals for sustained public awareness campaigns and enhanced technical and human capacity development within the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood ControlSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207