MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structural alteration of hippocampal subfields in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with dyslipidemia

2024· article· en· W4404887710 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chen Yang, Huiyan Zhang, Jing Tian, Zhoule Li, Ruifang Liu, Gang Huang, Lianping Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDyslipidemiaHippocampal formationDiabetes mellitusMedicineType 2 Diabetes MellitusNeuroscienceInternal medicineType 2 diabetesEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To explore alterations in hippocampal subfield volumes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with dyslipidemia using hippocampal subfield segmentation. METHODS: A total of 99 T2DM patients were prospectively recruited and divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of dyslipidemia: the T2DM dyslipidemia group and the T2DM normal lipidemia group. Additionally, 57 healthy volunteers were recruited as the healthy control (HC) group. General clinical data and cognitive psychological scale scores were collected. Subgroup analyses of T2DM patients were conducted based on the presence or absence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Hippocampal subfield volumes were analyzed using a general linear model with post-hoc Bonferroni correction. Significant differential hippocampal subfields were further analyzed in subgroups using the general linear model with post-hoc Bonferroni tests. Partial correlation analyses were performed to assess correlations between subfield-specific volumes and lipid and glucose metabolism indicators, as well as cognitive psychological scale scores. P-values from partial correlation analyses were corrected using the false discovery rate (FDR). RESULTS: Volumes of the bilateral hippocampal tail, left presubiculum_body, and right subiculum_body were significantly reduced in the T2DM dyslipidemia group compared to both the HC group and the T2DM normal lipidemia group. Post-hoc analyses revealed that the T2DM dyslipidemia group had the smallest hippocampal subfield volumes. Further subgroup analysis showed that T2DM dyslipidemia patients with MCI exhibited the most pronounced volume reductions in the bilateral hippocampal tail and right subiculum_body. After FDR correction, partial correlation analysis indicated that, in the T2DM dyslipidemia group, the left hippocampal tail volume was positively correlated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score. In the T2DM dyslipidemia without MCI group, the volume of the right subiculum_body was negatively correlated with fasting insulin levels and the insulin resistance index, but positively correlated with total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. In T2DM patients with normal lipidemia without MCI, the volume of the right subiculum_body was positively correlated with TC levels. CONCLUSION: T2DM patients with dyslipidemia, especially those with MCI, exhibit significant atrophy in hippocampal subfield volumes, with correlations observed between lipid levels and hippocampal subfield volume changes. These findings suggest that lipid alterations may play an essential role in hippocampal structural abnormalities and cognitive impairment in T2DM patients. This study provides new insights into the neuropathophysiological mechanisms underlying brain alterations and cognitive decline in T2DM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain ResearchSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207