MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404889766 · doi:10.1190/tle43120798.1

Introduction to this special section: Reservoir characterization

2024· article· en· W4404889766 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Bedle, Satinder Chopra, Tom Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsARC Resources (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)Characterization (materials science)Reservoir modelingSpecial sectionGeologyComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceEngineering physicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reservoir characterization is at the forefront of the energy transition, having evolved from its traditional role in hydrocarbon exploration to playing a vital role in developing subsurface energy solutions. As our industry navigates the complexities of meeting global energy demands while pursuing climate goals, the accurate characterization of subsurface formations has never been more important. The integration of multiple disciplines — from geophysics and geology to petrophysics and reservoir engineering — aids in the characterization framework for understanding the complex subsurface systems that will help power our future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207