Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo analiza la forma en que películas realizadas por indígenas en el Ártico canadiense y la Amazonía brasileña intervienen las formas canónicas de representación de sus paisajes, especialmente aquellas alojadas en la noción de terra nullius o “tierra sin dueño” que produjeron y afianzaron los Estados nacionales en continuidad con imaginarios coloniales. El artículo pregunta, primero, por la forma en que ambas regiones fueron integradas simbólicamente al relato nacional en los albores de las formaciones republicanas. Para ello, revisa tanto escritos como obras fotográficas, fílmicas y pictóricas de viajeros que fueron enviados por los Estados nacionales canadiense y brasileño, al Ártico y a la Amazonía. Finalmente, propone que los cines indígenas responden a estas imágenes dominantes poniendo en escena “estéticas del habitar”, que desmienten la idea de un Ártico y una Amazonía vacíos, para articular argumentos estético-políticos que respaldan las demandas de soberanía y potestad sobre el territorio. Para ello, se analizan varias películas realizadas por la productora Igloolik Isuma en Nunavut, Canadá, y la organización Video nas aldeias en Brasil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".