MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404904682 · doi:10.1186/s40246-024-00699-1

The associations of candidate gene polymorphisms with aspirin resistance in patients with ischemic disease: a meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4404904682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li Chunxing, Yuqiao Wang, Tiantian Liu, Hua Liu, Zhao Ren, Zhan‐Miao Yi

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Genomics · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHuman geneticsAspirinDiseaseMeta-analysisCandidate geneGeneBioinformaticsGeneticsMedicineBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Recently, extensive research has been conducted on the relationship between aspirin gene polymorphisms and aspirin resistance (AR) in patients with ischemic diseases. Among the numerous candidate genes, it remains unclear which ones are significantly associated with AR and could potentially serve as potential biomarkers for genetic testing before aspirin use. METHODS: Eligible articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WanFang, CNKI and Sinomed. A cohort study examining the efficacy of aspirin in secondary prevention for patients with ischemic diseases, along with a discussion on genetic polymorphisms and their association with AR, has been included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessing the quality of included studies. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as measures of effect. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on different genotypes with the same genetic polymorphisms, different research regions and types of ischemic diseases. RESULTS: From 75 eligible articles, 94 candidate gene polymorphisms were analyzed. In the overall analysis, 25 genes were subjected to meta-analysis and 69 genes were systematically described. 23 gene polymorphisms were observed to be significantly associated with AR, including PTGS2(rs20417) (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44-0.73), ITGA2(rs1126643) (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29-0.93), and TbXA2R(rs1131882) (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.09-2.18) were obtained from the combined analysis of this study, and 20 genes were systematically described in this study. Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that AA genotype for PTGS1(rs1330344) (OR = 0.56, 95%CI:0.43-0.74), C allele for PTGS1(rs5788) (OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.30-0.87) polymorphisms were significantly associated with AR. The polymorphisms of 13 genes, including PTGS1(rs1236913), have been studied only in Asia, GP6(rs1613662) has been studied only in Europe, and the polymorphisms of 5 genes, including ABCB1(rs1045642), showed different correlations with AR in various regions. The individuals with the PTGS1 (rs5788) variant who experienced an ischemic stroke (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.54-1.67) may exhibit an elevated risk of AR compared to those with coronary artery disease (OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.3-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that PTGS2(rs20417), ITGA2(rs1126643), and TbXA2R(rs1131882) could be potential genetic biomarkers for AR. Among these, PTGS2 (rs20417) is particularly suggested for individuals in Asia with ischemic diseases before aspirin use, as the GC/CC genotype raises AR risk by 42% compared to GG. ITGA2 (rs1126643) increases AR risk by 48% in Asia with the TC/TC genotype versus CC. However, results for ABCB1(rs1045642) and GP1BA(rs2243093) vary by regions, requiring further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.050
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman GenomicsSame topicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207