MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404905131 · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03306-x

Hypothalamic deep brain stimulation augments walking after spinal cord injury

2024· article· en· W4404905131 on OpenAlexafffund
Newton Cho, Jordan W. Squair, Viviana Aureli, Nicholas D. James, Léa Bole-Feysot, Inssia Dewany, Nicolas Hankov, Laetitia Baud, Anna Leonhartsberger, Kristina Sveistyte, Michael A. Skinnider, Matthieu Gautier, Achilleas Laskaratos, Katia Galan, Maged Goubran, Jimmy Ravier, Frédéric Merlos, Laura Batti, Stéphane Pagès, Nadia Bérard, Nadine Intering, Camille Varescon, Anne Watrin, Léa Duguet, Stefano Carda, Kay Bartholdi, Thomas H. Hutson, Claudia Kathe, Mark A. Anderson, Bogdan Draganski, Robin Demesmaeker, Léonie Asboth, Quentin Barraud, Jocelyne Bloch, Grégoire Courtine

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungGovernment of Canada
KeywordsSpinal cord injurySpinal cordMedicineDeep brain stimulationNeuroscienceBrainstemPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPremovement neuronal activityRehabilitationPsychologyParkinson's diseaseDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature MedicineSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207