MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404905622 · doi:10.5770/cgj.27.774

Determinants of First Practice Location among Canadian Geriatric Medicine Trainees and Recent Graduates: Findings of a Cross-sectional Survey in 2023

2024· article· en· W4404905622 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jasmine Mah, Tharsan Kanagalingam, Sarah Best, Sallie Elhayek, Jenny Thain, José A. Morais, Marianne Lamarre, Jaspreet Bhangu, Michael Borrie, Luxey Sirisegaram

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geriatrics Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAging and Gerontology Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity Health NetworkMcGill UniversitySinai Health SystemLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersCanadian Geriatrics Society
KeywordsMedicineIncentiveSubspecialtyFlexibility (engineering)Context (archaeology)Cross-sectional studyGeriatricsGerontologyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: There is a projected and growing gap of geriatricians in Canada. Geriatricians play a crucial role in addressing the health needs of older adults. We aimed to understand the factors that influence the choice of first-practice location for new geriatricians in the context of an aging Canadian population. Methods: We distributed an online survey to geriatric medicine subspecialty residents and recently licensed geriatricians in Canada. The survey was developed through expert opinions, career planning sessions, and a literature review. There were nine survey sections: general characteristics, location determinants, practice determinants, colleague determinants, support and space, non-clinical opportunities, income models, lifestyle factors, and recruitment determinants. The data were analyzed descriptively. Results: A total of 61 respondents (51 English, 10 French) completed the survey. The respondents were new practicing geriatricians (37) and geriatric medicine residents (24). Most planned to practice in Ontario (26.2%) or Quebec (27.9%), and 75.4% were women. Flexibility in work-life balance (95.1%), collegiality (93.4%) and reasonable call schedules (93.4%) were the most important factors influencing first practice location. Income did not rank among the highest priorities for choosing the first practice location relative to other factors but was mentioned in open-ended responses to recruitment questions. Conclusions: This is the first survey identifying the determinants of first practice location in geriatric medicine in Canada. Work-life balance and collegial support are a priority for new geriatricians and may be the strongest incentives a program can provide. For recruitment, income incentives may be beneficial to building new specialized geriatric services. Future research will examine determinants of first practice location among Care of the Elderly clinicians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geriatrics JournalSame topicAging and Gerontology ResearchFrench-language works237,207