MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404909541 · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130877

Application of machine learning tools to study the synergistic impact of physicochemical properties of peptides and filtration membranes on peptide migration during electrodialysis with filtration membranes

2024· article· en· W4404909541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation and Purification Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesUniversité Laval
KeywordsElectrodialysisMembraneFiltration (mathematics)ChemistryPeptideChromatographyChemical engineeringBiochemistryEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aimed to explore the application of machine learning-based tools to study the impact of physicochemical properties of peptides and filtration membranes (FM) on peptide migration during electrodialysis with filtration membranes (EDFM). A total of 14 membranes characterized in terms of 10 physicochemical properties were employed to evaluate the selective migration of cationic and anionic peptides from a tryptic hydrolysate of whey protein isolate well characterized by chemometric and bioinformatic methods. Two machine learning approaches were compared: Decision Tree (DT) and Binary Greedy Network (BGN). Based on the feature selection and model performance results, DT appeared to be the most appropriate approach to generate explanatory models of peptide migration. From the selected DT models, selective migration patterns associated with specific physicochemical properties of peptides and FMs were established for the first time. The migration of anionic peptides was positively affected by higher average peak-to-valley roughness (Rz) values and macropores distribution in the filtrating layer (Mp-FL), where S11N+ and PES300 were the FMs providing the highest recovery of this type of peptides, particularly for those with isoelectric point (pI) values lower than 4.407 (IDALNENK, KYLLFCMENSAEPEQSLACQCLVRTPEVD, SLAMAASDISLLDAQSAPL, SLAMAASDISLLDAQSAPLR, TDYKKYLLFCMENSAEPEQ, TPEVDDEALEK, TPEVDDEALEKFDK, VLVLDTDYK, and VYVEELKPTPEGDLEILLQK) which reached average recovery rates of 16.617 and 4.556 %, respectively. Regarding the migration of cationic peptides, this was mainly affected by other membrane characteristics such as volumetric porosity (Vp) and zeta potential (ZP), as well as peptide parameters such as polar residue content, pI, and leucine content. S11, S11SO3-, PES100, and PES300 were the FMs with the highest selective recovery rate for 7 out of 11 cationic peptides (ALPHMIR, IPAVFK, PMHI, PMHIR, TKIPAVF, TKIPAVFK, and VGINYWLAHK) with average values between 2.149 to 4.328 %. This novel DT-based approach represents a suitable tool for studying peptide migration, choosing the most appropriate FMs for selective bioactive peptide migration during EDFM, and understanding the phenomena involved in their migration process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it