MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Questioning the Great Narratives of War and Masculinity: The Routes and Roots of Violence in Melinda Nadj Abonji’s Novel <i>Tortoise Soldier</i> (<i>Schildkrötensoldat</i>)

2024· article· en· W4404913014 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Agatha Schwartz

Bibliographic record

VenueHungarian Studies Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasculinityNarrativeTortoiseGender studiesHistorySociologyCriminologyLiteratureArtEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article analyzes the novel Tortoise Soldier by Melinda Nadj Abonji, a Swiss German writer with Vojvodina Hungarian roots, with a focus on her critique of the mechanisms of social and historical violence and its deep-seated roots in unsettled ghosts of the past haunting multiethnic communities. Those mechanisms are exemplified through the little-known fate of the Vojvodina Hungarian minority during the wars that tore apart Yugoslavia. This article argues that the violence bursting open during armed conflict has its roots as much in traditional masculinity and its destructive gender norms, which affect minorities, women, and the environment, as in the unresolved presence of a communicative memory that is used and abused to justify social and ethnic exclusion and marginalization. Nadj Abonji’s novel challenges official historical narratives while also exploring ways to process trauma and loss through a narrative coming-to-terms with grief and mourning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.017
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHungarian Studies ReviewSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207