Performance Analysis of Cooperative Wireless-Powered NOMA System With Energy Buffer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an energy buffer aided cooperative wireless-powered non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) system, which includes a base station (BS), a near user (NU), and a far user (FU). To consider a more general case and improve the system performance as much as possible, both the NU and FU are equipped with energy buffers. Two different energy management policies are considered at the NU and FU, namely the best-effort policy (BEP) and on-off policy (OOP). In the proposed system, the NU and FU first collect and store radio frequency based energy from the BS. Then, the FU uses the stored energy to transmit its signal to both the BS and NU. The NU decodes the received signal from the FU and uses the stored energy to transmit the superimposed signal that consists of its own signal and the decoded FU signal to the BS. The outage probability and throughput expressions of the proposed system with BEP and OOP are derived over Rayleigh fading channels. Results reveal that the proposed system can significantly improve the performance of FU compared to the energy buffer aided non-cooperative wireless-powered NOMA system, and can outperform the buffer-less cooperative wireless-powered NOMA system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".