MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404914892 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3510400

Gravity Data Inversion by a Faulted 2-D Horizontal Block of Arbitrary Thickness With Application to Crustal Imaging

2024· article· en· W4404914892 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Salah A. Mehanee, Graham Heinson

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyInversion (geology)GeodesyBlock (permutation group theory)Remote sensingSeismologyGeophysicsGeometryTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient inversion scheme has been developed for the interpretation of a residual gravity profile measured over a 2-D truncated fault. The scheme determines the characteristic parameters (depth to the top surface of the fault, depth to the bottom surface of the fault, amount and direction of dip of the fault plane, and density contrast) and solves for the inverse characteristic parameters of a model in the space of their logarithms instead of the space of the model parameters themselves. The accuracy and convergence of the scheme have been successfully verified and assessed on various noise-free numerical examples. It was then carefully assessed on noisy numerical data, and it was found stable but nonunique. The sensitivity analysis and the numerical inversions have shown that the parameter that can be determined with the greatest accuracy is the amount of dip of the fault plane; the parameter is crucial for determining the fault type. The validity of the technique for practical applications has been successfully illustrated in two field examples for crustal imaging. The inversion of the Garber structure, Garber County, OK, USA, has revealed more accurate and realistic results than previously published interpretations. The data inversion of the Saganash Lake fault, Canada, indicates that the fault plane dips to the Southeast and the fault is of a reverse nature; this finding agrees well with the conclusion established by Nitescu and Halls (2002). The scheme is shown to be applicable for shallow and deep Earth imaging, and has potential applications in integrated and reconnaissance studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207