MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404916895 · doi:10.25071/2563-2418.95

Bab XVIII: Makanan dan Kemewahan

2023· article· id· W4404916895 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Albert Kruyt

Bibliographic record

VenueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Varietas padi dan pengupasannya. 2. Lesung, alu dan penampi. 3. Memasak nasi. 4. Penyajian makanan. 5. Waktu makan. 6. Sila sehubungan dengan makan. 7. Siapa yang tidak boleh makan nasi. 8. Cara penyiapan nasi. 9. Jagung, jali dan jawawut sebagai bahan makanan. 10. Umbi-umbian sebagai makanan. 11. Sagu. Asal usul Metroxylon. 12. Budidaya pohon sagu. 13. Mencuci sagu. 14. Sagu dari pohon aren. 15. Cara pembuatan sagu. 16. Sagu dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. 17. Sayuran sebagai lauk pauk. 18. Daging dan ikan sebagai lauk pauk. 19. Pohon buah-buahan yang penting untuk makanan. Pohon kelapa (kayuku). 20. Kelapa sebagai makanan dan kesaktiannya. 21. Pisang (loka), papaya (Carica papaya). 22. Kastanye liar (kasa). 23. Bumbu untuk lauk pauk. 24. Tebu dan Gula. 25. Madu sebagai makanan. Kekuatan ajaib lebah. 26. Tuak (baru). Sebaran pohon palem aren. 27. Pemilik pohon aren. 28. Cara kerja pohon aren. 29. Apa yang mempengaruhi hasil pohon. 30. Pesta Pohon Aren. 31. Tuak dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. 32. Penggunaan ajaib dari pohon aren. 33. Minuman keras. Ara. Pongasi . 34. Mengunyah sirih sebagai kemewahan. 35. Mengunyah sirih dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. 36. Penggunaan keajaiban sirih. 37. Pohon pinang (Areca catechu). 38. Gambir (gambe, catechu). 39. Kapur sebagai bahan unsur sirih. 40. Penanaman dan budidaya tembakau. 41. Dimana tembakau diperoleh. 42. Penggunaan bahan tembakau. 43. Kekuatan yang dianggap berasal dari tembakau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2160.093

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi ResearchSame topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207