MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404916907 · doi:10.25071/2563-2418.101

Bab XXIII: Perburuan

2023· article· id· W4404916907 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Albert Kruyt

Bibliographic record

VenueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInformation Technology and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Orang Toraja sebagai pemburu. 2. Persiapan ekspedisi berburu. 3. Salaa dan pemulihan darinya (molompahi). 4. Anjing pemburu. 5. Rombongan berburu dalam perjalanan. 6. Berburu dengan anjing. 7. Mengeluarkan isi perut babi. 8. Persiapan dan pengambilan harta rampasan. 9. Kembalinya dari berburu. 10. Hewan buruan yang diburu dengan anjing (babi, babirusa, anoa). 11. Rusa di Sulawesi Tengah. 12. Menangkap burung dengan ranting jeruk nipis (mopuyu). 13. Menangkap ayam kayu. 14. Sumpitan (sopu). 15. Racun panah dan akibat yang ditimbulkannya. 16. Penggunaan paku bambu dalam berburu. 17. Perangkap dan jerat. 17. Perangkap dan jerat

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.392
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi ResearchSame topicInformation Technology and LearningFrench-language works237,207