MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404916930 · doi:10.25071/2563-2418.64

LIRIK, SEJARAH, DAN ALEGORI,

2022· article· id· W4404916930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artikel ini menyelidiki bagaimana komunitas agama minoritas di dataran tinggi Sulawesi, Indonesia, menciptakan makna, sejarah, dan politik melalui wacana lirik upacara pengayauan. Diskusi menunjukkan bagaimana interpretasi yang berbeda dari satu lagu bekerja sebagai mode pemahaman taktis, sebagai cara untuk "menafsirkan dengan pemerintahan." Dalam satu kasus, seorang penduduk desa membaca lirik sedemikian rupa untuk menghubungkan upacara pengayauan dengan ketegangan antarbudaya di masa lalu. Namun, dalam kasus lain, seorang penduduk desa menemukan dalam lirik sebuah alegori politik seksual lokal. Kedua pendekatan tersebut menghubungkan kekerasan ritual dengan pembentukan komunitas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.556
GPT teacher head0.608
Teacher spread0.052 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it