MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404916961 · doi:10.25071/2563-2418.127

BAB VIII. DEWA DAN ROH

2024· article· id· W4404916961 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Albert C. Kruyt

Bibliographic record

VenueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Sang Pencipta. 2. Langit dan bumi. 3. Nabi. 4. Penciptaan. 5. Penciptaan manusia dari beras dan air liur. 6. Penciptaan manusia dari tulang rusuk. 7. Alatala, Sang Pemelihara. 8. Kehidupan kekal. 9. Predestinasi. 10. Utusan Alatala. 11. Buriro (Bada' Buriro'). 12. Pue Ura. 13. Mesomba. 14. Meranga'ahi. 15. Pelayanan bulan. 16. Hamba khusus para dewa. 17. Tempat Tinggal Para Dewa. 18. Roh Udara. 19. Pinowali. 20. Pelayan tampilangi. 21. Anitu bobo. 22. Wurake. 23. Roh udara lainnya. 24. Roh air. 25. Nama-nama roh air. 26. Kontak roh air dengan manusia. 27. Imbu. 28. Tolengkodu. 29. Roh Pohon. 30. Towana, touta. 31. Roh pohon lainnya. 32. Roh pohon di daerah aliran sungai. 33. Kontak manusia dengan roh pohon. 34. Roh bumi. 35. Ular sebagai perwujudan roh bumi. 36. Ular itu tidak boleh dibunuh. 37. Menghidupkan orang mati. 38. Ular adalah pembawa kehidupan. 39. Bertemu dengan ular. 40. Membuat gubuk miniatur. 41. Menangkal bencana yang akan datang dengan menggunakan seekor anjing. 42. Roh perang. 43. Roh perang khusus. 44. Maradika i Kulu. 45. Segala jenis makhluk halus di daerah pegunungan. 46. Roh dataran rendah. 47. Mobaratapa. 48. Roh yang berwujud manusia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4810.382

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.296
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi ResearchSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207