Impact of AI on the Cyber Kill Chain: A Systematic Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Cyber Kill Chain (CKC) defense model aims to assist subject matter experts in planning, identifying, and executing against cyber intrusion activity, by outlining seven stages required for adversaries to execute an attack. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have empowered adversaries to execute sophisticated attacks to exploit system vulnerabilities. As a result, it is essential to consider how AI-based tools change the cyber threat landscape and affect the current standard CKC model. Thus, this study examines and categorizes how attackers use AI-based tools, and offers potential defense mechanisms. We conducted a systematic literature review of 62 papers published between 2013 and 2023 from the Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Our findings indicate that AI-based tools are used most effectively in the initial stages of cyberattacks. However, we find that current defense tools are not designed to counter these sophisticated attacks during these stages. Thus, we provide insights to 1) highlight the changing threat landscape due to AI and 2) to guide the development of cyber defense mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it