MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404917461 · doi:10.25071/2563-2418.57

BAB V Konsep Keadilan

2022· article· id· W4404917461 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Albert Kruyt, Nicolaus Adriani, Albert Schrauwers

Bibliographic record

VenueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Perasaan Orang Toraja akan keadilan. 2. Hakim. 3. Tindakan hukum. Monuntu. 4. Pemutusan kasus hukum. 5. Denda, megiwu. 6. Besaran dan nama denda. 7. Pengambilan sumpah. 8. Sumpah sehubungan dengan penolakan. 9. Cobaan mogego, menancapkan tombak. 10. Cara lain untuk "menancapkan tombak." 11. Cobaan mencili, “menyelam.” 12. Jenis cobaan lainnya. 13. Hukuman fisik hanya dijatuhkan pada budak. 14. Hukuman mati untuk pembunuhan. 15. Cedera dan pembunuhan secara tidak sengaja. 16. Hukuman mati untuk perbuatan asosial (sihir, inses, perzinahan, pengkhianatan). 17. Pelaksanaan hukuman mati. 18. Pengadilan untuk pencurian. 19. Pengadilan atas penghinaan. 20. Pengadilan untuk pembakaran. 21. Kasus hutang. 22. Penjamin kredit. 23. Cara untuk menagih hutang. Mebaula. 24. Mongguraru. 25. Mesara'u. 26. Mopangaya. 27. Keadilan budak. Saju mpowatua. Mepone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.351
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi ResearchSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207