MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404918480 · doi:10.21105/joss.07542

THzTools: data analysis software for terahertztime-domain spectroscopy

2024· article· en· W4404918480 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Posada Loaiza, Santiago Higuera-Quintero, Atif Noori, Laleh Mohtashemi, Ryan Hall, Naod Ayalew Yimam, J. Steven Dodge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftwareTerahertz time-domain spectroscopyComputer scienceTerahertz radiationSpectroscopyPython (programming language)Data miningTerahertz spectroscopy and technologyComputational sciencePhysicsProgramming languageOpticsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changed Change default noisefit algorithm to estimate mu using a weighted average of the measured waveforms after rescaling and shifting, rather than optimizing the cost function with respect to mu directly (#85) (Alireza Noori) Change procedure to evaluate parameter uncertainties, from direct computation of the Hessian to numerical evaluation using numdifftools (#85) (Alireza Noori) Deprecate mu_err and p_err attributes of FitResult class (#108) (Alireza Noori) Added Add etfe function (Augusten Fairbairn, Japneet Sandhu, Chloe Chan) Add workers parameter to noisefit function to allow parallel processing of FFTs (#78) (Rabin Meetarbhan) Add links to top keywords in documentation (Wesley Xu) Add est_mu parameter to thztools (Alireza Noori) Add support for Python 3.14 (#92) (Steve Dodge) Add mu_cov, psi_cov, delta_norm, delta_norm_cov, epsilon_norm, epsilon_norm_cov, and delta_norm_epsilon_norm_cov attributes to FitResult class (#108) (Alireza Noori) Removed Remove support for Python 3.9 (#92) (Steve Dodge) Fixed Fix noisefit examples in documentation (#81) (Alireza Noori) Apply Bessel correction to estimated noise model parameter uncertainties returned by noisefit (#86) (Alireza Noori) Fix error in cost function Jacobian used in noisefit (#87)) (Alireza Noori) Fix erroneous warnings when using NumPy <2.3 on Apple Silicon M4 chips numpy/numpy#28687 Fix error in cost function Jacobian when numpy_sign_convention = False (7c11c58) (Steve Dodge) Fix inconsistent internal scaling of eta parameter (c0a725f)(Steve Dodge)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0870.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207