Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Treaty Law Division of Global Affairs Canada is part of the Department's Public International Law Bureau.The Division is responsible for providing legal advice to the federal government on international treaty law and Canadian treaty practice and reviews all legally binding and non-legally binding international instruments negotiated and entered into on behalf of Canada.The Division is also responsible for administering Canada's treaty adoption process and the Policy on Tabling of Treaties in Parliament, including the preparation of formal instruments relating to the signature and entry into force of international treaties by the Government of Canada.The Division maintains the original text or a certified copy of treaties signed by Canada and publishes on an annual basis in the Canada Treaty Series (CTS) the texts of agreements that have come into force for Canada.Detailed information on the Division, as well as access to the CTS and to the treaties signed and/or in force for Canada is available on Global Affairs Canada's public treaty web portal at . / La Direction du droit des traités d'Affaires mondiales Canada fait partie de la Direction générale du droit international public du Ministère. La Direction est chargée de fournir au gouvernement fédéral des conseils juridiques sur le droit international des traités et sur la pratique canadienne en matière de traités, et revoit tous les instruments internationaux contraignants et non contra- ignants négociés et conclus au nom du Canada. La Direction est également chargée d'administrer le processus d'adoption des traités du Canada et la Politique sur le dépôt des traités devant le Parlement, y compris la préparation des instruments officiels relatifs à la signature et à l'entrée en vigueur des traités internationaux par le gouvernement du Canada. La Direction conserve le texte original ou une copie certifiée des traités signés par le Canada, et elle publie chaque année dans le Recueil des traités du Canada (RTC) les textes des traités qui sont entrés en vigueur pour le Canada. Des informations détaillées, ainsi qu'un accès au RTC et aux traités signés par et/ou en vigueur pour le Canada, sont disponibles sur le portail public des traités d'Affaires mondiales Canada à .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".