MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404937185 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.2024636016

Efficient Multidimensional Deconvolution with an H2-Like Parametrization

2024· article· en· W4404937185 on OpenAlexaff
Daria Sushnikova

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionParametrization (atmospheric modeling)Computer scienceBlind deconvolutionAlgorithmApplied mathematicsMathematicsPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary This study presents a new approach to improving the efficiency of Multidimensional Deconvolution (MDD) for seismic wavefield redatuming. While MDD offers more accurate results than traditional methods, it is often limited by high computational demands due to the large and complex matrices involved in the process. We introduce an innovative technique that uses low-rank and H2-like parametrization to compress these matrices, reducing both memory usage and computational costs. Our method focuses on representing the operator, right-hand side, and unknowns in a low-rank format, allowing for the solution of smaller linear systems in the frequency domain. This approach is tested on 2D and 3D synthetic seismic datasets, demonstrating significant reductions in computational complexity with only a slight decrease in solution quality. The potential impact of this method is substantial—it could make MDD a more viable tool for large-scale geophysical applications, offering significantly improved efficiency. By using H2-like matrix compression, we enable faster and more resource-effective seismic wavefield reconstructions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207