MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404937278 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1488820

Probing the diagnostic values of plasma cf-nDNA and cf-mtDNA for Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy

2024· article· en· W4404937278 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ying Chao, Yuan Li, Hui Zhang, Shimin Pang, Shuwen Hao, Songnian Hu, Lifang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAtrophyParkinson's diseaseDiseaseMitochondrial DNAMedicinePathologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Cell loss and mitochondrial dysfunction are key pathological features of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA). It remains unclear whether disease-specific changes in plasma circulating cell-free nuclear DNA (cf-nDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA) occur in patients with PD and MSA. In this study, we investigated whether plasma cf-nDNA, cf-mtDNA levels, as well as cf-mtDNA integrity, are altered in patients with PD and MSA. Methods TaqMan probe-based quantitative PCR was employed to measure plasma cf-nDNA levels, cf-mtDNA copy numbers, and cf-mtDNA deletion levels in 171 participants, including 76 normal controls (NC), 62 PD patients, and 33 MSA patients. A generalized linear model was constructed to analyze differences in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) biomarkers across clinical groups, while a logistic regression model was applied to assess the predictive values of these biomarkers for developing PD or MSA. Spearman correlations were used to explore associations between the three cfDNA biomarkers, demographic data, and clinical scales. Results No significant differences in plasma cf-nDNA levels, cf-mtDNA copy numbers, or cf-mtDNA deletion levels were observed among the PD, MSA, and NC groups (all P > 0.05). Additionally, these measures were not associated with the risk of developing PD or MSA. In PD patients, cf-nDNA levels were positively correlated with Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores (Rho = 0.382, FDR adjusted P = 0.027). In MSA patients, cf-nDNA levels were positively correlated with International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale scores (Rho = 0.588, FDR adjusted P = 0.011) and negatively correlated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (Rho = −0.484, FDR adjusted P = 0.044). Subgroup analysis showed that PD patients with constipation had significantly lower plasma cf-mtDNA copy numbers than those without constipation (P = 0.049). MSA patients with cognitive impairment had significantly higher cf-nDNA levels compared to those without (P = 0.008). Conclusion Plasma cf-nDNA level, cf-mtDNA copy number, and cf-mtDNA deletion level have limited roles as diagnostic biomarkers for PD and MSA. However, their correlations with clinical symptoms support the hypothesis that cell loss and mitochondrial dysfunction are involved in PD and MSA development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207