MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404941425 · doi:10.25071/2563-2418.32

LAOLITA i WALI mPANGIPI

2022· article· id· W4404941425 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicolaus Adriani, Albert Schrauwers

Bibliographic record

VenueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cerita, teks dan terjemahan Wali mPangipi yang disediakan di sini, berasal dari negara bagian Tojo, dan dengan demikian memiliki tradisi sastra yang sama dengan Sese nTaola. Diceritakan kepada saya oleh seseorang bernama Pake, seorang Tojo, seorang budak milik Sa'ungkubi, atau dikenal sebagai Papa i Melempo. Cerita ini saya transkrip di Poso pada saat panen raya (Agustus) tahun 1897. Sebagai sebuah karya sastra, Wali mPangipi tentu kualitasnya lebih rendah dari Sese nTaola. Meskipun, secara keseluruhan, cerita ini dibangun lebih baik daripada Sese nTaola, karena yang terakhir tiga kali lebih panjang, cukup banyak bakat yang dibutuhkan dalam menghasilkan cerita yang panjang daripada kasus Wali mPangipi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.395
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.031 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLOBO Annals of Sulawesi ResearchSame topicLiterary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsFrench-language works237,207