MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404943793 · doi:10.1101/2024.11.29.626076

Knowledge Graph and Machine Learning Help the Research of Drugs Aimed at Neurological Diseases

2024· preprint· en· W4404943793 on OpenAlexaff
Luca Menestrina, Maurizio Recanatini

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsInnovative Targeting Solutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnowledge graphGraphComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPsychologyData scienceMedicineTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, we present PATHOS (PATHologies of HOmo Sapiens), a semantically rich knowledge graph constructed by integrating diverse datasets spanning multiple biomedical entity types. PATHOS provides a comprehensive resource for representing and exploring the intricate relationships underlying human diseases. To leverage this resource, we developed LOGOS (Learning Optimized Graph-based representations of Object Semantics), a graph embedding model capable of generating predictions relevant to drug research. The PATHOS-LOGOS framework was validated through three neurological case studies: drug repurposing for Alzheimer’s disease, phenotype selection for Huntington’s disease, and protein target identification in multiple sclerosis. The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to advance therapeutic insights and inform biomedical research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207