ESG Disclosure Based on Regulatory Landscape: An Enquiry Into the Stock Exchange Enlisted Banks in a Fastest Growing Economy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to reveal the extent, modes, and trend of ESG disclosure by the banks in Bangladesh. Analyses involve annual reports of 28 banks from 2016 to 2022 through the content analysis method using a ‘checklist’ comprised of 143 ESG disclosure items compiled from several policy guidelines regarding environmental and social performance disclosure circulated by the central bank, Bangladesh Bank. The study finds a spontaneously increasing tendency for ESG disclosure during the study period. Banks disclose information in both financial and non-financial modes, along with necessary details. However, information non-disclosure results in 75.18%, 63.38%, and 67.40% of environmental, social, and governance information, including many important ESG aspects that should not be ignored. The study result represents an optimistic scenario of ESG disclosure; nonetheless, Bangladeshi banks are yet to develop ESG disclosure practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it