A Distributed Incentive Mechanism to Balance Demand and Communication Overhead for Multiple Federated Learning Tasks in IoV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated learning (FL), as a typical distributed machine learning framework, has been effectively applied to traffic flow optimization, driving behavior analysis, and other areas. However, the stability and efficiency of FL systems heavily rely on the quality and cooperation of participants. If participants find no profit in the FL process, they may reduce their willingness to participate due to energy consumption and limited resources. To bridge these gaps, this article proposes a demand-balanced incentive mechanism for multiple FL tasks. First, considering the time-varying channel characteristics in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) scenario, two optimization problems are constructed: 1) maximizing task-matching satisfaction and 2) minimizing communication energy consumption. Second, these problems are transformed into a distributed incentive mechanism based on a multileader-multifollower (MLMF) Stackelberg game, and a bi-level alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithm is proposed to solve for the optimal resource allocation and reward schemes that balance the demands of all parties. Furthermore, this article designs a multiagent deep reinforcement learning-based method to solve the incentive problem, thereby avoiding the impact of information asymmetry. Simulation results verify that the proposed scheme not only balances the demands of all parties but also enhances user participation without being affected by the number of participants, making it suitable for IoV environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".