Vision-Based Prediction of Flashover Using Transformers and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prediction of fire growth is crucial for effective firefighting and rescue operations. Recent advancements in vision-based techniques using RGB vision and infrared (IR) thermal imaging data, coupled with artificial intelligence and deep learning techniques, have shown promising solutions to be applied in the detection of fire and the prediction of its behavior. This study introduces the use of Convolutional Long Short-term Memory (ConvLSTM) network models for predicting room fire growth by analyzing spatiotemporal IR thermal imaging data acquired from full-scale room fire tests. Our findings revealed that SwinLSTM, an enhanced version of ConvLSTM combined with transformers (a deep learning architecture based on a new mechanism called multi-head attention) for computer vision purposes, can be used for the prediction of room fire flashover occurrence. Notably, transformer-based ConvLSTM deep learning models, such as SwinLSTM, demonstrate superior prediction capability, which suggests a new vision-based smart solution for future fire growth prediction tasks. The main focus of this work is to perform a feasibility study on the use of a pure vision-based deep learning model for analysis of future video data to anticipate behavior of fire growth in room fire incidents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".