Development of Polypyrrole/Cellulose Composite Based Pseudocapacitive Bioelectrode for Enhanced Performance of Biofuel Cell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optimized enzymatic electrodes utilizing a polypyrrole/cellulose composite with high internal capacitance were developed for an enhanced enzymatic fuel cell.Gluconobacter sp.fructose dehydrogenase enzyme was electrophoretically bound and fixed to the polypyrrole/cellulose matrix.Laccase from Trametes versicolor was utilized as the cathode bioelectrocatalyst, being entrapped electrochemically.The composite film made of polypyrrole and cellulose displayed pseudocapacitive characteristics in neutral pH circumstances.After being modified with carboxylic groups, the composite material facilitated effective enzyme adsorption as well as ensured proper electrical connection between the enzyme's active sites as well as the electrode exterior.The updated polypyrrole/cellulose composite electrode was employed as the anode for fructose oxidation without a mediator, achieving a significant catalytic current density of 13.1mA cm -2 .Dioxygen decreases at 3 mA/cm 2 current density was achieved by a composite film that contained laccase and was made of polypyrrole and cellulose.The film contained 2,2'azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) as a mediator.Utilizing a pseudocapacitive matrix as well as reducing the electrode distance to 1.5 mm enhanced the power output as well as regeneration capacity of the biofuel cell.Implementing a preconditioning stage where the cell was held at open circuit voltage while fuel flows has been found to improve the cell's power output.After the matrix was recharged after a 24h preconditioning time, the device produced 3.1 mW/cm2 power and an open-circuit voltage of 0.61 V.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".