MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404980847 · doi:10.1080/19392699.2024.2434891

Accurate foreign object detection for the coal preparation industry based on computer vision and deep learning algorithms

2024· article· en· W4404980847 on OpenAlexaff
Kefei Zhang, Teng Wang, Liang Xu, Jesse Van Griensven Thé, Zhongchao Tan, Hesheng Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsLakes Environmental (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceObject detectionArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMinimum bounding boxBounding overwatchDeep learningFeature extractionComputer visionMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate detection of foreign objects during industrial coal preparation is crucial to ensuring the safety of equipment and personnel, as well as maintaining the green utilization of the coal product. The complexity of industrial coal preparation environments presents challenges for vision-based foreign object detection. This work introduces the SHA-DH-YOLOX algorithm, designed to enhance detection accuracy. The proposed algorithm boosts three notable improvements. First, the Shuffle Attention mechanism (SHA) is integrated into the YOLOX backbone to strengthen the feature extraction of essential information from input images. Second, the Dynamic head (Dyhead) is introduced into the feature fusion to enhance the detector’s representation capability, improving scale-, spatial-, and task-awareness. Third, the original Intersection over Union (IoU) loss function is replaced with SCYLLA-IoU (SIoU) to achieve more accurate bounding boxes and enhanced training stability. These improvements work collaboratively with YOLOX-M, resulting in it outperforming state-of-the-art baseline models, including YOLOv5, YOLOv6, YOLOv7, YOLOv8, and original YOLOX. The developed SHA-DH-YOLOX algorithm improves AP50 by 1.87 to 7.97% compared to baseline models of equivalent size. Robustness tests further affirm the stability of the SHA-DH-YOLOX model when facing diverse and challenging scenarios. This pioneering work provides valuable tools for achieving safe and reliable coal preparation practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Coal Preparation and UtilizationSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207